FCC questions AT&T, Apple, and Google over rejected Google Voice app

504x_504x_appshosed (Photo  Credit: Gizmodo)

Yes, that’s right, the FCC has some questions they want answered.

The FCC (Federal Communications Commission) has sent letters to AT&T, Apple, and Google over the strangely rejected Google Voice app. In the letter sent to Google they ask for a description of the Google Voice app and whiter or not Google has been approved for previous apps on the App Store (they have been approved before). To the phone manufacturer, the letter asks whether or not AT&T had any involvement in rejecting the Voice app.

Here is what FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski recently said in a statement:

The request is part of a broader-ranging inquiry by the commission on exclusive deals between cell phone carriers and handset manufacturers for hot phones. FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said Thursday that the FCC wants to look into rural areas where customers can’t buy the latest fancy phones because of such exclusive deals.

I’m sure AT&T has something fishy to do with it. After all, this is AT&T! All of this talk might not bring Google Voice to the iPhone (sigh), but it makes sure that something like this doesn’t happen again.



5 Thoughts on “FCC questions AT&T, Apple, and Google over rejected Google Voice app

  1. Pingback: Google CEO resigns from Apple board today over “conflict of interest” « Laptop Memo, the Gadget Reviews & News blog

  2. Pingback: FCC questions AT&T, Apple, and Google over rejected Google Voice … | appreviewers.co.cc

  3. Pingback: FCC questions AT&T, Apple, and Google over rejected Google Voice …

  4. Pingback: FCC questions AT&T, Apple, and Google over rejected Google Voice …

  5. Pingback: Posts about Gizmodo as of July 31, 2009 » The Daily Parr

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Post Navigation